Fake or fact: SP-Congress alliance in UP faces poster dilemma
Fake or fact: SP-Congress alliance in UP faces poster dilemma New Delhi, Oct 26 (IANS) The appearance of posters declaring, “200 seat haq hai hamara, UP ko hai Rahul Gandhi par bharosa” (200 seats are our right, Uttar Pradesh trusts Rahul Gandhi) has triggered a fresh controversy at a time when seat-sharing negotiations between the Congress and Samajwadi Party (SP) remain unresolved as the battle for the 2027 Assembly election slowly gathers momentum in India’s largest state.
Recognising the potentially disruptive nature of the message, SP chief Akhilesh Yadav quickly dismissed the hoardings as “fake” and accused the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of attempting to create divisions within the INDIA Bloc. He has reportedly argued that the ruling party was uncomfortable with Opposition unity and was using unauthorised posters to generate mistrust between allies. He is also said to have demanded action against municipal officials for allegedly allowing the displays without proper authorisation.
Whether or not the posters were part of a political conspiracy is secondary to the larger political reality they have highlighted. The fact remains that seat-sharing talks between the two parties remain among the most challenging exercises. Reports indicate that the Congress seeks a larger role, while its stronger regional ally appeared resistant to conceding its space, where sections within the SP reportedly remain unconvinced that its political partner possesses sufficient ground strength in the state to justify a large allocation of seats.
The Congress-SP partnership produced impressive results in Uttar Pradesh during the 2024 Lok Sabha election, giving the INDIA Bloc a significant boost and reducing the BJP’s dominance in the state. Perhaps encouraged by that performance, Congress leaders have been pushing for an early seat-sharing arrangement where they reportedly want a “respectable” number for themselves. That number, as reports have long been quoting regional leaders, could be “anything above 150 seats” in the 403-member strong Assembly where other alliance partners would also seek, again, “respectable” allocations.
In fact, recent inputs have cited that an “initial list” of anything between 175 and 200 seats has been submitted by the Congress recently, with statements being attributed to the state party’s top leadership. Meanwhile, the disagreement has already triggered public sparring between leaders of the two parties, with reports of leaders on both sides exchanging barbs over respective political stature, organisational strength, and electoral contributions.
A final call is likely to be taken after testing the waters by Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav. Now, the seemingly simple political hoarding has exposed the deeper complexities of alliance politics between the two allies. The posters, which appeared in Lucknow and other districts, projected an ambitious claim for a near-equal partnership in an alliance where the SP remains the dominant regional force by electoral strength and organisational presence.
Despite its setbacks at the state hustings, the Congress appears currently buoyed by the leverage of the visibility of Rahul Gandhi and the INDIA Bloc’s national campaign, especially on the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voters’ list. At the same time, the party’s organisational footprint in Uttar Pradesh being considerably weaker than that of the SP makes the Congress believe it needs a large number of seats to rebuild its political presence.
Meanwhile, the SP intends to calculate seat allocation primarily on the basis of winnability and existing grassroots networks. It is thus now a combination of poll arithmetic and political chemistry, with a practical distribution of seats calculated on electoral strength based on mutual trust, respect, and the willingness to make compromises. Therefore, the hoardings appear to have touched a sensitive nerve because they appeared to tilt the conversation toward entitlement rather than negotiation.
